TE · BAL · Oklahoma Rd 3, Pick 86 (2018) · 122 career games · 78-44 team record
| Season | Team | G | Tgt | Rec | Ctch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Y/Rec | Rec TD | EPA/tgt | Succ% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | BAL | 16 | 50 | 34 | 68.0 | 552 | 11.0 | 16.2 | 3 | 0.78 | 64 |
| 2019 | BAL | 15 | 98 | 64 | 65.3 | 852 | 8.7 | 13.3 | 10 | 0.47 | 49 |
| 2020 | BAL | 14 | 88 | 58 | 65.9 | 701 | 8.0 | 12.1 | 7 | 0.42 | 55 |
| 2021 | BAL | 17 | 158 | 107 | 67.7 | 1,361 | 8.6 | 12.7 | 9 | 0.35 | 60 |
| 2022 | BAL | 15 | 114 | 73 | 64.0 | 847 | 7.4 | 11.6 | 5 | 0.22 | 57 |
| 2023 | BAL | 10 | 61 | 45 | 73.8 | 544 | 8.9 | 12.1 | 6 | 0.54 | 64 |
| 2024 | BAL | 17 | 69 | 55 | 79.7 | 673 | 9.8 | 12.2 | 11 | 0.73 | 71 |
| 2025 | BAL | 17 | 70 | 48 | 68.6 | 422 | 6.0 | 8.8 | 5 | 0.02 | 50 |
| 2026 | BAL | 1 | 6 | 4 | 66.7 | 49 | 8.2 | 12.3 | 0 | 0.35 | 50 |
| 9 seasons | 122 | 714 | 488 | 68.3 | 6,001 | 8.4 | 12.3 | 56 | 0.41 | 58 |
Loading injury data...
Every Mark Andrews target, 2025, pre-loaded.
Open in the Lab →Data: nflverse (CC BY 4.0), modified
Percentiles rank each stat against qualified TEs in 2025. Higher is better.
Receiving yards by week
| Wk | Opp | Inj | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | YAC | Tot EPA | xFP | PPR | Diff | Snap% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ BUF | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | — | 1 | +0.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | +0.1 | 75% | |
| 2 | vs CLE | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | -3.0 | 9.9 | 1.4 | -8.5 | 80% | |
| 3 | vs DET | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 91 | 2 | 26 | +10.1 | 11.8 | 27.1 | +15.3 | 81% | |
| 4 | @ KC | — | — | — | 8 | 7 | 30 | — | 5 | -4.2 | 11.1 | 10.0 | -1.1 | 55% | |
| 5 | vs HOU | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 22 | — | 5 | -3.2 | 5.1 | 4.2 | -0.9 | 58% | |
| 6 | vs LA | 3 | 2 | — | 6 | 4 | 24 | — | — | -0.5 | 15.6 | 6.6 | -9.0 | 78% | |
| 8 | vs CHI | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 34 | — | 7 | +1.8 | 5.3 | 6.4 | +1.1 | 60% | |
| 9 | @ MIA | 2 | 4 | — | 3 | 2 | 22 | 2 | 5 | +7.8 | 10.6 | 16.6 | +6.0 | 50% | |
| 10 | @ MIN | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 4 | +0.3 | 11.5 | 10.4 | -1.1 | 63% | |
| 11 | @ CLE | 1 | 35 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 32 | — | 10 | +6.4 | 11.2 | 15.7 | +4.5 | 61% | |
| 12 | vs NYJ | 2 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | 9 | — | 2 | -2.3 | 8.4 | 2.1 | -6.3 | 67% | |
| 13 | vs CIN | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 47 | — | 17 | -3.0 | 10.2 | 8.7 | -1.5 | 68% | |
| 14 | vs PIT | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 9 | — | — | -4.3 | 10.0 | 1.9 | -8.1 | 68% | |
| 15 | @ CIN | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 18 | — | — | +0.7 | 5.3 | 3.8 | -1.5 | 41% | |
| 16 | vs NE | 1 | 3 | — | 3 | 2 | 21 | — | 7 | -0.2 | 5.1 | 4.4 | -0.7 | 44% | |
| 17 | @ GB | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 28 | — | 7 | +2.6 | 5.2 | 6.8 | +1.6 | 41% | |
| 18 | @ PIT | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 14 | — | 2 | -1.0 | 3.8 | 3.4 | -0.4 | 59% |
xFP · Opportunity already given, not a forecast.
Expected points: ffopportunity (Joe Sydlowski, Tan Ho (ffverse)), CC BY-SA 4.0, shown as published. Model v1.0.0.