WR · DET · USC Rd 4, Pick 112 (2021) · 84 career games · 48-35 team record
| Season | Team | G | Tgt | Rec | Ctch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Y/Rec | Rec TD | EPA/tgt | Succ% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | DET | 16 | 121 | 90 | 74.4 | 912 | 7.5 | 10.1 | 5 | 0.44 | 60 |
| 2022 | DET | 16 | 146 | 106 | 72.6 | 1,161 | 8.0 | 11.0 | 6 | 0.39 | 60 |
| 2023 | DET | 16 | 165 | 119 | 72.1 | 1,515 | 9.2 | 12.7 | 10 | 0.43 | 59 |
| 2024 | DET | 17 | 141 | 115 | 81.6 | 1,263 | 9.0 | 11.0 | 14 | 0.68 | 68 |
| 2025 | DET | 17 | 172 | 117 | 68.0 | 1,401 | 8.1 | 12.0 | 11 | 0.32 | 53 |
| 2026 | DET | 2 | 27 | 19 | 70.4 | 209 | 7.7 | 11.0 | 4 | 0.43 | 52 |
| 6 seasons | 84 | 772 | 566 | 73.3 | 6,461 | 8.4 | 11.4 | 50 | 0.45 | 59 |
Loading injury data...
Every Amon-Ra St. Brown target, 2025, pre-loaded.
Open in the Lab →Data: nflverse (CC BY 4.0), modified
Percentiles rank each stat against qualified WRs in 2025. Higher is better.
Receiving yards by week
| Wk | Opp | Inj | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | YAC | Tot EPA | xFP | PPR | Diff | Snap% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ GB | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 45 | — | 5 | +0.6 | 10.7 | 8.5 | -2.1 | 94% | |
| 2 | vs CHI | 2 | 7 | — | 11 | 9 | 115 | 3 | 48 | +13.7 | 27.9 | 39.2 | +11.3 | 85% | |
| 3 | @ BAL | — | — | — | 8 | 7 | 77 | 1 | 13 | +8.7 | 16.2 | 20.7 | +4.5 | 85% | |
| 4 | vs CLE | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 70 | 2 | 34 | +8.8 | 15.1 | 26.0 | +10.9 | 90% | |
| 5 | @ CIN | — | — | — | 9 | 8 | 100 | — | 59 | +6.7 | 15.5 | 18.0 | +2.5 | 81% | |
| 6 | @ KC | 1 | 2 | — | 10 | 9 | 48 | — | 13 | -0.1 | 15.6 | 13.7 | -1.9 | 89% | |
| 7 | vs TB | — | — | — | 10 | 6 | 86 | 1 | 46 | +0.0 | 17.0 | 20.6 | +3.6 | 91% | |
| 9 | vs MIN | — | — | — | 13 | 9 | 97 | — | 22 | +2.4 | 24.7 | 18.7 | -6.0 | 95% | |
| 10 | @ WAS | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 58 | 1 | 44 | +4.1 | 17.6 | 16.8 | -0.8 | 77% | |
| 11 | @ PHI | — | — | — | 12 | 2 | 42 | — | 17 | -10.7 | 20.8 | 6.2 | -14.6 | 97% | |
| 12 | vs NYG | — | — | — | 13 | 9 | 149 | 1 | 53 | +5.8 | 24.9 | 29.9 | +5.0 | 97% | |
| 13 | vs GB | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — | — | -1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | 6% | |
| 14 | vs DAL | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 92 | — | 52 | +2.3 | 14.9 | 15.2 | +0.3 | 92% | |
| 15 | @ LA | — | — | — | 18 | 13 | 164 | 2 | 68 | +10.6 | 37.8 | 41.4 | +3.6 | 95% | |
| 16 | vs PIT | — | — | — | 9 | 4 | 54 | — | 46 | -0.9 | 20.3 | 9.4 | -10.9 | 97% | |
| 17 | @ MIN | — | — | — | 13 | 8 | 68 | — | 16 | -0.4 | 20.6 | 14.8 | -5.8 | 83% | |
| 18 | @ CHI | — | — | — | 15 | 11 | 139 | — | 45 | +6.0 | 27.4 | 24.9 | -2.5 | 95% |
xFP · Opportunity already given, not a forecast.
Expected points: ffopportunity (Joe Sydlowski, Tan Ho (ffverse)), CC BY-SA 4.0, shown as published. Model v1.0.0.