WR · CLE · Alabama Rd 1, Pick 15 (2020) · 92 career games · 31-61 team record
| Season | Team | G | Tgt | Rec | Ctch% | Rec Yds | Y/Tgt | Y/Rec | Rec TD | EPA/tgt | Succ% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | DEN | 16 | 115 | 52 | 45.2 | 856 | 7.4 | 16.5 | 3 | -0.01 | 37 |
| 2021 | DEN | 10 | 56 | 38 | 67.9 | 467 | 8.3 | 12.3 | 0 | 0.28 | 50 |
| 2022 | DEN | 15 | 100 | 67 | 67.0 | 972 | 9.7 | 14.5 | 6 | 0.47 | 49 |
| 2023 | DEN | 16 | 87 | 54 | 62.1 | 758 | 8.7 | 14.0 | 2 | 0.19 | 48 |
| 2024 | CLE | 17 | 147 | 90 | 61.2 | 1,229 | 8.4 | 13.7 | 4 | 0.27 | 52 |
| 2025 | CLE | 17 | 106 | 50 | 47.2 | 602 | 5.7 | 12.0 | 2 | -0.30 | 36 |
| 2026 | CLE | 1 | 4 | 2 | 50.0 | 26 | 6.5 | 13.0 | 0 | -1.52 | 50 |
| 7 seasons | 92 | 615 | 353 | 57.4 | 4,910 | 8.0 | 13.9 | 17 | 0.13 | 45 |
Loading injury data...
Every Jerry Jeudy target, 2025, pre-loaded.
Open in the Lab →Data: nflverse (CC BY 4.0), modified
Percentiles rank each stat against qualified WRs in 2025. Higher is better.
Receiving yards by week
| Wk | Opp | Inj | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | YAC | Tot EPA | xFP | PPR | Diff | Snap% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vs CIN | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 66 | — | 10 | -3.3 | 12.4 | 11.6 | -0.8 | 88% | |
| 2 | @ BAL | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 51 | — | 9 | -1.4 | 12.6 | 9.1 | -3.5 | 88% | |
| 3 | vs GB | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 17 | — | — | -0.2 | 7.0 | 2.7 | -4.3 | 83% | |
| 4 | @ DET | — | — | — | 9 | 3 | 48 | — | 9 | -9.7 | 14.0 | 7.8 | -6.2 | 82% | |
| 5 | vs MIN | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 15 | — | 3 | -2.8 | 7.1 | 3.5 | -3.6 | 90% | |
| 6 | @ PIT | — | — | — | 13 | 5 | 43 | — | 14 | -2.3 | 17.8 | 9.3 | -8.5 | 89% | |
| 7 | vs MIA | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 17 | — | 10 | -1.1 | 5.4 | 3.7 | -1.7 | 68% | |
| 8 | @ NE | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — | — | -4.3 | 4.8 | 0.0 | -4.8 | 83% | |
| 10 | @ NYJ | — | — | — | 12 | 6 | 78 | 1 | 29 | +4.0 | 17.8 | 19.8 | +2.0 | 96% | |
| 11 | vs BAL | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 21 | — | 10 | -4.5 | 9.0 | 5.1 | -3.9 | 82% | |
| 12 | @ LV | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 39 | — | 14 | -9.4 | 3.5 | 2.9 | -0.6 | 65% | |
| 13 | vs SF | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 26 | — | 2 | +0.5 | 5.8 | 5.6 | -0.2 | 84% | |
| 14 | vs TEN | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 76 | 1 | 44 | +4.8 | 7.7 | 16.6 | +8.9 | 88% | |
| 15 | @ CHI | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 22 | — | — | -2.2 | 5.3 | 4.2 | -1.1 | 96% | |
| 16 | vs BUF | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 12 | — | 3 | +2.3 | 5.6 | 4.2 | -1.4 | 73% | |
| 17 | vs PIT | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 54 | — | 4 | +0.1 | 10.9 | 10.4 | -0.5 | 94% | |
| 18 | @ CIN | 1 | 5 | — | 6 | 2 | 17 | — | 5 | -0.2 | 11.0 | 4.2 | -6.8 | 88% |
xFP · Opportunity already given, not a forecast.
Expected points: ffopportunity (Joe Sydlowski, Tan Ho (ffverse)), CC BY-SA 4.0, shown as published. Model v1.0.0.